tendencies

How a team plays, not how well — pace, personnel, play-action, motion, and how opponents choose to defend them.

[TABLES]

teams · passing · rushing · receiving · games · adjusted · tendencies · coverage · pressure

[FETCH]

GET /v1/leaders/tendencies?format=json
GET /v1/leaders/tendencies?format=csv

# params: season, week_min, week_max, pos, min, as_of, format, limit
# rows in current slice: 32

[COLUMNS]

team: Team · s
games: G · i
plays: Plays · i
proe: PROE · n
pass_rate: Pass% · p
ed_pass: EarlyDn Pass% · p
shotgun: Shotgun% · p
no_huddle: NoHudl% · p
pa_rate: PlayAct% · p
rpo: RPO% · p
screen: Screen% · p
motion: Motion% · p
p11: 11 Pers% · p
p12: 12 Pers% · p
p21: 21 Pers% · p
ttt: TimeToThrow · n
box: Box · n
blitz_faced: Blitzers · n
man_faced: Man% · p
prss_faced: Prss%Faced · p · lower better

[PREVIEW · 12 of 32]

team  games  plays  proe    pass_rate  ed_pass  shotgun  no_huddle  pa_rate  rpo    screen  motion  p11    p12    p21   ttt    box    blitz_faced  man_faced  prss_faced
----  -----  -----  ------  ---------  -------  -------  ---------  -------  -----  ------  ------  -----  -----  ----  -----  -----  -----------  ---------  ----------
KC    17     1,097  4.600   66.9%      63.3%    81.0%    2.6%       8.1%     11.5%  4.7%    39.9%   51.1%  25.7%  3.4%  2.700  4.870  0.160        18.8%      16.8%     
ARI   17     1,132  4.200   69.9%      66.8%    71.2%    12.0%      13.8%    2.0%   4.7%    35.4%   42.2%  33.5%  0.1%  2.750  4.950  0.180        15.7%      17.5%     
LA    20     1,317  3.100   60.1%      55.9%    42.6%    7.1%       15.8%    0.4%   3.0%    50.6%   51.4%  9.5%   1.2%  2.670  5.060  0.190        16.7%      11.3%     
NE    21     1,318  2.400   61.5%      55.2%    56.8%    3.4%       10.8%    1.3%   2.3%    40.2%   54.3%  23.7%  4.0%  2.820  5.080  0.200        16.7%      15.1%     
CIN   17     1,097  2.100   66.2%      62.1%    82.0%    2.6%       8.5%     7.3%   3.3%    42.1%   53.6%  32.6%  2.8%  2.600  4.800  0.170        18.1%      16.1%     
DEN   19     1,250  2.100   63.8%      57.7%    66.2%    13.1%      12.5%    7.0%   5.5%    39.9%   60.8%  19.5%  1.4%  2.780  4.830  0.180        13.3%      14.4%     
JAX   18     1,180  2.000   60.9%      57.6%    61.5%    7.2%       10.2%    3.6%   3.8%    47.1%   60.4%  18.1%  3.6%  2.730  4.900  0.180        13.6%      13.8%     
LAC   18     1,186  0.900   63.9%      59.1%    71.4%    4.4%       11.5%    2.0%   2.8%    42.2%   63.6%  14.5%  0.3%  2.740  5.020  0.230        19.5%      18.7%     
DAL   17     1,167  -0.200  63.2%      56.5%    63.6%    9.3%       13.0%    4.1%   2.7%    47.1%   56.7%  22.4%  0.0%  2.720  4.960  0.220        18.3%      15.7%     
PIT   18     1,074  -0.300  62.1%      55.9%    67.3%    12.1%      9.2%     7.0%   6.6%    43.4%   43.7%  26.7%  6.1%  2.510  4.940  0.130        15.5%      10.8%     
SF    19     1,216  -0.300  60.2%      56.0%    54.4%    4.2%       10.8%    0.6%   3.0%    55.1%   68.1%  21.8%  0.1%  2.830  5.030  0.120        15.0%      12.2%     
HOU   19     1,287  -0.500  61.0%      55.6%    61.3%    4.2%       11.2%    1.3%   2.2%    44.7%   64.0%  13.2%  4.5%  2.670  5.090  0.250        16.7%      14.6%

[POINT-IN-TIME]

These are aggregates over play-by-play, so as_of applies to them too. A board fetched with as_of returns the standings as they were computable on that date — target share through week 9 as known in week 9, not as known today. Omitting as_of returns latest and is unsafe for backtesting.